Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component

1. Overview:

  • Title: Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component
  • Authors:
    • Silvia Cecchel
    • Giovanna Cornacchia
    • Andrea Panvini
  • Publication Year: 2016
  • Journal/Conference: JOM (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)
  • Keywords:
    • Life cycle assessment (LCA)
    • High-pressure die casting (HPDC)
    • Aluminum
    • Automotive component
    • Energy analysis

2. Research Background:

  • Social/Academic Context of the Research Topic:
    • Lightweighting of automotive components has become increasingly important for economic and environmental reasons.
    • Reducing vehicle mass directly improves fuel consumption and reduces emissions.
    • There is a growing trend to adopt low-density materials like aluminum alloys in vehicles, replacing conventional steel and cast iron parts.
    • The automotive industry has exponentially increased the use of aluminum alloys, and this trend is expected to continue.
    • Aluminum automotive components are mainly produced in wrought or cast forms, with high-pressure die casting (HPDC) being the most prevalent process for high-volume production.
    • HPDC efficiently manufactures near-net shape lightweight aluminum parts, achieving a 30% to 50% weight reduction compared to steel.
    • To evaluate the real environmental benefit, a proper life cycle assessment (LCA) considering the entire product lifecycle is necessary.
    • Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a tool to study the environmental burden of products at all stages, from resource extraction to disposal, including manufacturing, use, and end-of-life.
    • One of the key roles of LCA is to support correct eco-design.
    • While using aluminum reduces vehicle weight and fuel consumption, aluminum alloy component production may require more energy.
  • Limitations of Existing Research:
    • While many LCA studies exist for automotive components, few detail the real parts' production processes.
    • Dalquist et al. (16) provided general information based on aggregate national data and representative machines, lacking accuracy for specific component production evaluation.
    • Singh et al. (17) developed a model for die-casting part sustainability at the design stage, but analyzed only a small part of manufacturing (melting and holding) based on theoretical equations.
    • Gunasegaram et al. (18) compared aluminum and magnesium production for a small component (converter housing, ~3 kg), which is not applicable to larger, safety-relevant automotive components like the one in this study (~15 kg) that require different process parameters and tooling.
  • Necessity of Research:
    • Aluminum HPDC process involves energy-intensive manufacturing phases requiring step-by-step evaluation.
    • Accurate environmental impact assessment of automotive components requires in-depth analysis based on real data.
    • Environmental impact assessment of critical components like safety-relevant automotive parts is particularly important.

3. Research Objectives and Research Questions:

  • Research Objective:
    • To assess the cradle-to-gate environmental impact of producing a safety-relevant aluminum high-pressure die-casting component (suspension cross-beam) for commercial vehicles.
    • To develop and apply an LCA model evaluating environmental impact in terms of energy use.
    • To analyze the environmental benefits of aluminum recycling.
  • Core Research Questions:
    • What is the energy consumption of each stage in the production of a safety-relevant aluminum HPDC automotive component?
    • What is the impact of aluminum recycling on the overall energy consumption?
    • What are the potential improvements to reduce the environmental burden of aluminum HPDC component production?
  • Research Hypotheses:
    • The primary aluminum production stage will be the most energy-intensive phase in aluminum HPDC component production.
    • Aluminum recycling will significantly reduce overall energy consumption.

4. Research Methodology:

  • Research Design:
    • Cradle-to-gate LCA methodology, following ISO 14040:2006 standard.
    • Cumulative energy use assessment method.
    • Development and application of a new LCA model.
  • Data Collection Methods:
    • Primary data collected from actual production sites through collaborations with automotive supplier companies.
    • EAA (European Aluminium Association) data for raw material extraction to primary aluminum ingot stages.
    • Literature review and industry databases.
  • Analysis Methods:
    • LCA model construction based on collected data.
    • Calculation and analysis of energy consumption for each stage.
    • Aluminum recycling scenario analysis.
    • Comparison of energy consumption (with and without recycling).
  • Research Subjects and Scope:
    • Target component: Aluminum HPDC suspension cross-beam for commercial vehicles (safety-relevant).
    • Functional unit: Production batch of 250 units of HPDC aluminum suspension beams.
    • System boundary: Cradle-to-gate (raw material extraction, primary aluminum ingot realization, component casting, finishing, recycling).
    • Process stages:
      • Raw material extraction to primary aluminum ingot: Bauxite mining, alumina production (Bayer process), aluminum electrolysis (Hall-Héroult process), cast house.
      • Primary aluminum ingot to component casting: Melting, holding, casting (HPDC).
      • Finishing: 5-axis machining.
      • Recycling: Aluminum scrap recycling.

5. Key Research Findings:

  • Core Research Findings:
    • Primary aluminum production stage accounts for the largest share of total energy consumption (Table I, Fig. 2).
    • Component casting stage is the second largest energy-consuming stage (Table I, Fig. 2).
    • Energy contribution of the finishing operation is negligible (Table I, Fig. 2).
    • Aluminum recycling (EOL stage) recovers approximately 42% of the total energy consumption (Table I, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
  • Statistical/Qualitative Analysis Results:
    • Table I. Energy by life cycle stages:
      • Primary aluminum: 68,211 kWh
      • Casting: 15,005 kWh
      • Finishing: 800 kWh
      • EOL: -47,751 kWh
      • Total: 84,016 kWh
      • Total EOL: 36,265 kWh
    • High energy consumption in primary aluminum production is closely related to the liquid aluminum electrolysis process.
    • The casting stage accounts for about 18% of the total energy, demonstrating the energy intensity of the casting process.
    • Aluminum recycling significantly contributes to energy recovery.
  • Data Interpretation:
    • Environmental impact of aluminum HPDC components is mainly driven by the primary aluminum production stage.
    • The casting process also has significant energy consumption, requiring efforts to improve process efficiency.
    • Increasing aluminum recycling rates is highly effective in reducing environmental impact.
  • Figure Name List:
    • Fig. 1. Life cycle assessment flow-chart.
    • Fig. 2. Energy by life cycle stages without EOL.
    • Fig. 3. Energy by life cycle stages with EOL.
    • Fig. 4. Total energy comparison.
Fig. 1. Life cycle assessment flow-chart.
Fig. 1. Life cycle assessment flow-chart.
Fig. 2. Energy by life cycle stages without EOL.
Fig. 2. Energy by life cycle stages without EOL.
Fig. 3. Energy by life cycle stages with EOL.
Fig. 3. Energy by life cycle stages with EOL.
Fig. 4. Total energy comparison.
Fig. 4. Total energy comparison.

6. Conclusion and Discussion:

  • Summary of Main Findings:
    • This study performed a cradle-to-gate LCA of an aluminum HPDC suspension cross-beam for commercial vehicles, analyzing energy consumption.
    • Primary aluminum production is the most energy-intensive stage, followed by the component casting stage.
    • Energy consumption of the finishing stage is negligible.
    • Aluminum recycling recovers a significant portion of total energy consumption, providing environmental benefits.
  • Academic Significance of the Research:
    • Provides an in-depth analysis of the environmental impact of the aluminum HPDC process.
    • Presents a case study of developing and applying an LCA model based on real industry data.
    • Quantitatively demonstrates the importance of aluminum recycling.
  • Practical Implications:
    • Increasing aluminum recycling rates is crucial to reduce the environmental impact of aluminum HPDC component production.
    • Technology development and application to improve the energy efficiency of the casting process are needed.
    • LCA results should be considered from the product design stage to promote eco-friendly design.
  • Limitations of the Research:
    • This study is a case study for a specific aluminum HPDC component, and generalization to other components or processes may be limited.
    • LCA model data is based on data from a specific time and company, and results may vary with temporal and regional changes.
    • This study only evaluated environmental impact in terms of energy consumption, and other environmental impact categories (e.g., global warming, resource depletion) were not considered.

7. Future Follow-up Research:

  • Directions for Future Research:
    • Expand LCA research to various types of aluminum HPDC components and processes.
    • Conduct LCA evaluations including other environmental impact categories beyond energy consumption.
    • Develop energy efficiency improvement technologies for the casting process and evaluate them based on LCA.
    • Study methods to improve the efficiency of aluminum recycling systems.
    • Comparative environmental impact studies between aluminum HPDC and other manufacturing methods (e.g., steel press forming) (as mentioned in the paper for future works).
  • Areas Requiring Further Exploration:
    • Optimization of aluminum HPDC process and energy-saving technologies.
    • Policies and technology development to increase aluminum recycling rates.
    • Continuous improvement of LCA methodology and expansion of databases.

8. References:

  1. H. Helms and U. Lambrecht, Int. J. LCA (2006). doi:10. 1065/lca2006.07258.
  2. S. Das, JOM 52, 41 (2000).
  3. J. Hirsch, Mater. Forum 28, 15 (2004).
  4. J. Kasai, JSAE Rev. 20, 387 (1999).
  5. G.S. Cole and A.M. Sherman, Mater. Charact. 35, 3 (1995).
  6. S.W. Hadley, S. Das, and J.W. Mille, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2000). doi:10.2172/814613.
  7. A.A. Luo, A.K. Sachdev and B.R. Powell, China Foundry 7, 463 (2010).
  8. D.R. Gunasegaram and A. Tharumarajah, Metal. Trans. B 40, 605 (2009).
  9. J.B. Guine´e, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7, 311 (2002).
  10. International Standard Organisation (ISO), ISO14040: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework (Geneva: ISO, 2006), pp. 1–20.
  11. J. Green, Aluminum Recycling and Processing for Energy Conservation and Sustainability (Novelty, OH: ASM International, 2007), pp. 1–14.
  12. H.C. Kim and T.J. Wallington, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6089 (2013).
  13. H. Kim, C. McMillan, G.A. Keoleian and S.J. Skerlos, J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 929 (2010).
  14. C. Wagner, J. Provo, and C. Koffler, Comparative Life Cycle assessment of Aluminum and Steel Truck Wheels (Alcoa, 2012). http://www.alcoawheels.com/alcoawheels/north_ america/en/pdf/Alcoa_Comparative_LCA_of_Truck_ Wheels_with_CR_statement.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.
  15. C.A. Ungureanu, S. Das and I.S. Jawahir, in Aluminum Alloys Transport, Package, Aerospace. Other Applications, Proceedings Symposium, ed. S.K. Das and W. Yin (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2007), pp. 11–24.
  16. S. Dalquist and T. Gutowski, Life Cycle Analysis of Conventional Manufacturing Techniques: Die Casting (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Paper no. LMPMIT-TGG-03-12-09-2004). http://web.mit.edu/ebm/Publica tions/Die%20Casting%20Dalquist%20Gutowski.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2014.
  17. R. Singh, C.D. Singh and S. Singh Sidhu, IJMDEBM 1, 21 (2013).
  18. D.R. Gunasegaram and A. Tharumarajah, Metal. Trans. B 40B, 605 (2009).
  19. F. Mathieux and D. Brissaud, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55, 92 (2010).
  20. European Aluminium Association, Environmental Profile Report for the European Aluminium Industry (European Aluminum Association, 2013). http://european-aluminium. eu/media/1329/environmental-profile-report-for-the-eur opean-aluminium-industry.pdf. Accessed Apr 2013.
  21. C. Panseri, Manuale di fonderia dell’alluminio (Milan, IT: Hoelpi, 1966), p. 439.
  22. S. Nagendra Parashar and R.K. Mittal, in Elements of Manufacturing Processes (New Delhi, IN: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, 2006), p. 233.
  23. H. Bakemeyer, Report No. E-902 (NADCA, Arlington Heights, IL, 2008).
  24. M. Bertram, M. Hryniuk, G. Kirchner and F. Pruvost, Aluminium Recycling in Europe (Brussels, BL: EAA/OEA Recycling Division), p. 1.
  25. R. Dhingra and S. Das, J. Clean. Prod. 85, 347 (2014).

9. Copyright:

  • This material is based on the paper: Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component by Silvia Cecchel, Giovanna Cornacchia, and Andrea Panvini.
  • Paper Source: DOI: 10.1007/s11837-016-2046-3

This material is a summary based on the above paper, and unauthorized use for commercial purposes is prohibited.
Copyright © 2025 CASTMAN. All rights reserved.

Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive ComponentDownload
Tags: aluminum alloy; ,aluminum alloys; ,Applications; ,AUTOMOTIVE Parts; ,CAD; ,Die casting; ,Efficiency; ,Review; ,STEP; ,자동차; ,자동차 부품; ,자동차 산업; ,해석