Agile Methods on the Shop Floor: Towards a “Tesla Production System”?

This article introduces the paper ['Agile Methods on the Shop Floor: Towards a “Tesla Production System”?"'] published by ['Weizenbaum Institut'].

1. Overview:

  • Title: Agile Methods on the Shop Floor: Towards a “Tesla Production System”?
  • Author: Timo Daum
  • Publication Year: December 2022
  • Publishing Journal/Academic Society: Weizenbaum Series \ 31, Weizenbaum Institut
  • Keywords: Not explicitly listed in the document, but based on content: Agile Methods, Shop Floor, Tesla Production System, Digital Firm, Lean Production, Automotive Industry, Manufacturing, Software Development.

2. Abstracts or Introduction

This discussion paper investigates two questions: To what extend can Tesla be regarded as a digital firm, and do we as a result see elements of a distinct "Tesla production system”?
While the EV-startup is widely approached as a competing automaker focusing on the electric drive train, which it certainly is, this paper argues that it can only fully be understood as a digital firm – a digital car company with a digital product embedded in a digital ecosystem. Its roots in Silicon Valley, its software-first approach, and its strategic exploitation of user activity data point into this direction.
In the second part, this paper explores to what extent Tesla's rootedness in software and its Silicon-Valley ancestry gave reason to introduce methods borrowed from software development on the shop floor. To a certain degree, concepts from agile software development found their way to the very assembly-line at Tesla.
Although it might be exaggerated to speak of a distinct "Tesla Production system”, indications for a considerable and possibly enduring alteration of Lean Production paradigm can be determined.

3. Research Background:

Background of the Research Topic:

The research topic is situated within the context of the evolving automotive industry, particularly the rise of Tesla as an electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer. Tesla's emergence challenges traditional automotive paradigms, prompting questions about its nature as a digital firm and the characteristics of its production system. The paper highlights the conventional perception of Tesla as an EV startup focused on electric powertrains, but argues for a deeper understanding of Tesla as a digital entity operating within a digital ecosystem. This perspective is rooted in Tesla's Silicon Valley origins, its software-centric approach, and its strategic utilization of user data.

Status of Existing Research:

Existing research often frames Tesla as a disruptive force in the automotive sector, primarily due to its EV technology. However, the paper identifies a gap in understanding Tesla's production system through the lens of "digital firm" characteristics and the adoption of agile methodologies from software development. The paper notes the limited academic literature on agility in manufacturing and hardware engineering, with exceptions mainly in prototyping and maker movements. It points out the prevailing belief in the industry that software-centric agile methods are not directly transferable to hardware manufacturing ("Bits are not atoms" (Denning 2018)).

Necessity of the Research:

The research is necessary to explore the potential paradigm shift in automotive manufacturing exemplified by Tesla. It addresses the need to understand if and how agile methods, standard in software development, are being applied in hardware production, specifically at Tesla. The paper emphasizes the potential alteration of the established Lean Production paradigm, driven by digitalization and the increasing software-driven nature of physical products. Understanding Tesla's approach is crucial for assessing the future trajectory of manufacturing in the automotive industry and potentially beyond, especially as industries increasingly integrate digital technologies and seek faster innovation cycles.

4. Research Purpose and Research Questions:

Research Purpose:

The research purpose is to investigate whether Tesla embodies the characteristics of a digital firm and to explore the extent to which Tesla has adopted agile methods from software development in its manufacturing processes. Ultimately, the paper aims to determine if these factors contribute to a distinct "Tesla Production System" that potentially modifies or transcends the traditional Lean Production paradigm in the automotive industry.

Key Research:

The key research questions are:

  1. To what extent can Tesla be regarded as a digital firm?
  2. Does Tesla exhibit elements of a distinct "Tesla production system”?
  3. Has Tesla transferred development methods from software to hardware engineering and manufacturing?
  4. Have agile methods, standard in software production, been implemented in hardware development at Tesla Motors?
  5. Does this implementation constitute a modification or transcendence of established paradigms like the Toyota or Lean Production System?

Research Hypotheses:

The paper does not explicitly state hypotheses in a traditional scientific format. However, the implicit hypotheses guiding the discussion are:

  1. Tesla operates as a digital firm, leveraging platform ecosystems, information space exploitation, perpetual innovation, and hybrid user engagement, similar to internet companies.
  2. Tesla's production system incorporates elements of agile methodologies, adapted from software development, into its hardware manufacturing processes.
  3. These characteristics contribute to a production system at Tesla that deviates from and potentially improves upon the traditional Lean Production paradigm, representing a significant evolution in automotive manufacturing.

5. Research Methodology

Research Design:

This paper employs a qualitative research design, characterized as a discussion paper. It is primarily theoretical and conceptual, drawing upon existing literature and industry observations to analyze Tesla's operational model and production system.

Data Collection Method:

The data collection is based on a review of existing literature, industry reports, expert opinions, and publicly available information about Tesla. This includes:

  • Academic publications on digital firms, agile methodologies, and automotive industry trends.
  • Industry analysis and reports from consulting firms (e.g., Morgan Stanley).
  • Automotive journalism and expert commentary (e.g., Edward Niedermeyer, Sandy Munro, Joe Justice).
  • Tesla's official statements and publications ("About Tesla", "Tesla Model S", "Tesla FSD Beta").
  • Online media and podcasts discussing Tesla's practices (e.g., Unusually Well Informed Podcast, The Agile Wire).

Analysis Method:

The analysis is primarily descriptive and interpretative. The author analyzes Tesla's practices through the theoretical frameworks of digital capitalism, agile methodologies, and production paradigms (Fordism, Lean Production). The paper uses a comparative approach, contrasting Tesla's methods with traditional automotive manufacturers and software development companies. It synthesizes information from various sources to build a case for Tesla as a digital firm and to identify elements of agile methods in its manufacturing.

Research Subjects and Scope:

The research subject is Tesla Motors and its production system. The scope is focused on analyzing Tesla's characteristics as a digital firm and its adoption of agile methods in manufacturing, specifically in the context of automotive production. The analysis is limited to publicly available information and does not involve primary empirical data collection within Tesla's facilities.

6. Main Research Results:

Key Research Results:

  1. Tesla as a Digital Firm: The paper argues that Tesla operates fundamentally as a digital firm, characterized by:
    • A platform-based ecosystem encompassing vehicles, charging infrastructure, energy solutions, and digital services.
    • Exploitation of the "information space" through data collection and utilization for product improvement and new business models (e.g., insurance).
    • Perpetual innovation through over-the-air (OTA) updates and continuous product development.
    • Engagement of "hybrid users" who contribute to product improvement through data generation and feedback.
  2. Agile Methods on the Shop Floor: The paper identifies evidence suggesting Tesla's adoption of agile principles in manufacturing:
    • Short development cycles and rapid iteration in production.
    • Cross-functional teams and close collaboration between design and production.
    • Test-Driven Development (TDD) principles applied to both software and hardware, including "factory mode" for automated testing.
    • Continuous improvement and adaptation in manufacturing processes, exemplified by the Giga Press and factory design.
  3. "Tesla Production System" - A Modified Lean Paradigm: The paper suggests that Tesla is developing a production system that, while not entirely distinct, represents a significant alteration of the Lean Production paradigm. This "Tesla Production System" is characterized by:
    • Increased agility and flexibility in design and manufacturing.
    • Software-centric approach influencing hardware production.
    • Data-driven decision-making and continuous feedback loops.
    • Vertical integration and reduced product variety, reminiscent of Fordism, combined with agile principles.

Analysis of presented data:

The paper analyzes Tesla's operational model and manufacturing practices by drawing parallels with digital firms and software development methodologies. It uses examples like Tesla's OTA updates, FSD development, Giga Press implementation, and factory design to illustrate the application of agile and digital principles in a hardware manufacturing context. The analysis emphasizes the contrast between Tesla's approach and traditional automotive manufacturers, particularly in terms of innovation speed, flexibility, and customer engagement. The paper acknowledges that while some aspects of Tesla's system align with Lean Production principles, the emphasis on agility and software-driven iteration marks a significant departure.

Figure Name List:

The submitted document does not contain any figures.

7. Conclusion:

Summary of Key Findings:

The paper concludes that Tesla exhibits characteristics of a digital firm applied to automotive manufacturing. It argues that Tesla has integrated agile methods, traditionally used in software development, into its shop floor operations. This integration, combined with Tesla's digital firm nature, suggests the emergence of a "Tesla Production System" that modifies the Lean Production paradigm. Key elements include rapid iteration, cross-functional collaboration, data-driven improvements, and a software-centric approach to hardware.

Academic Significance of the Study:

The study contributes to the academic discourse on the evolving nature of manufacturing in the digital age. It provides a case study of Tesla as an example of how digital capitalism's logic and agile methodologies are being applied in a traditional industry like automotive manufacturing. The paper highlights the potential paradigm shift in production systems, moving beyond traditional Lean Production towards more agile and software-integrated models. It also raises questions about the broader implications of this shift for other industries.

Practical Implications:

The practical implications are relevant for automotive manufacturers and other industries seeking to enhance innovation and adapt to digital transformation. The paper suggests that embracing agile principles and adopting a software-centric mindset can lead to faster product development cycles, increased flexibility in manufacturing, and improved responsiveness to customer feedback. The "Tesla Production System" model, while still evolving, offers insights into potential future directions for manufacturing operations in a digitally driven economy.

Limitations of the Study and Areas for Future Research:

The study acknowledges limitations due to the reliance on publicly available information and the anecdotal nature of some evidence regarding agile implementation at Tesla. It calls for further research to:

  • Investigate the application of agile methods in Tesla's more recent factories (Shanghai, Grünheide, Austin) to see if the observed patterns are consistent and evolving.
  • Explore the extent to which Tesla adapts its production system to local conditions and engineering traditions in different national contexts.
  • Conduct empirical research within Tesla's manufacturing facilities to gain a deeper understanding of the actual implementation and impact of agile methods.
  • Analyze the significance of agile methods for engineering and manufacturing more broadly, beyond the Tesla case, and assess if Tesla's approach foreshadows industry-wide developments.
  • Investigate whether Tesla's modifications are specific to EV production or represent a more generalizable trend in manufacturing digitalization.

8. References:

  • “About Tesla" (2022). https://www.tesla.com/about
  • "Agile Manifesto“ (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org
  • “Große Energiekonzerne bekommen Konkurrenz: Tesla bietet ersten Stromtarif an“ (2021). 31/8/2021. https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/oekostrom-grosse-energiekonzerne-bekommen-konkurrenz-tesla-bietet-ersten-stromtarif-an-10474258
  • "Tesla FSD Beta (Full Self Driving) Explained” (2022). 2/9/2022. https://www.findmyelectric.com/blog/tesla-fsd-beta-full-self-driving-explained/
  • “Tesla Model S” (2022). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S
  • "Tesla Supercharger” (2022). Wikipedia. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Supercharger
  • Accialini, N (2022): Agile Manufacturing: strategie per una manifattura adattiva, resiliente e sostenibile. Independently published.
  • Agile Alliance (2015). Scrum of Scrums. 17/12/2015. https://www.agilealliance.org/glossary/scrum-of-scrums/
  • Beck, K.; Andres; C. (2012). Extreme programming explained. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
  • Blokdyk, G. (2021): Agile Manufacturing A Complete Guide. 5STARCooks.
  • Boes, A. (2005). “Informatisierung“ SOFI, IAB, ISF München, INIFES (Hrsg.). Berichterstattung zur sozioökonomischen Entwicklung in Deutschland – Arbeits- und Lebensweisen. Erster Bericht. Wiesbaden, S. 211-244.
  • Boes, A. (2021a). Umbruch in der Industrie: Game-Changer Tesla als Chance nutzen. Berichte aus der Forschungswerkstatt 1/2021. München.
  • Boes, A.; Kämpf, T. (2012). “Informatisierung als Produktivkraft: Der informatisierte Produktionsmodeus als Basis einer neuen Phase des Kapitalismus". Dörre, Klaus, et al. Kapitalismustheorie und Arbeit neue Ansätze soziologischer Kritik. Frankfurt am Main, S. 316-335.
  • Boes, A.; Ziegler, A. (2021). Umbruch in der Automobilindustrie. Analyse der Strategien von Schlüsselunternehmen an der Schwelle zur Informationsökonomie, ISF München 2021. https://doi.org/10.36194/IDGUZDA_Forschungsbericht_Auto
  • Boes, A., Sattelberger, T.; Welpe, I. (2015). Das demokratische Unternehmen Neue Arbeits- und Führungskulturen im Zeitalter digitaler Wirtschaft. München: Haufe Lexware.
  • Bork, H. (2022). “Teslas Konstruktionsmethode verbreitet sich in China“, 3/1/2022. https://www.automobil-industrie.vogel.de/teslas-konstruktionsmethode-verbreitet-sich-in-china-a-1084799/
  • Butollo, F.; Schneidemesser, L. (2022). Platforms in Industry – disruptors of traditional manufacturing? Policy Brief, February 2022.
  • Butollo, F.; Jürgens, U.; Krzywdzinski, M. (2018). "Von Lean Production zur Industrie 4.0. Mehr Autonomie für die Beschäftigten?” Arbeits- und Industriesoziologische Studien Jahrgang 11, Heft 2, Oktober 2018, S. 75-90.
  • Canzler, W.; Knie, A. (2019). “Die Autoindustrie: für radikale Innovationen nicht geschaffen". Jannsen, N., Dudenhöfer, F., Canzler, W. et al. Autoindustrie auf dem richtigen Weg? Wirtschaftsdienst 99, 451–469 (2019). S. 460-463
  • Canzler, W.; Knie, A. (2021). “Der alte Traum vom privaten Glück – Die Autoindustrie als Teil eines vergangenen Gesellschaftsentwurfs”, WSI-Mitteilungen 74 (3), S. 207-215.
  • Carlier, M. (2022). “Plug-in electric vehicle sales market share by producer 2021“. Statista. 7/9/2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/541390/global-sales-of-plug-in-electric-vehicle-manufacturers/
  • Carney, D. (2022). “Volvo Joins Tesla in the Giga Press Club". 14/3/2022. https://www.design-news.com/automotive-engineering/volvo-joins-tesla-giga-press-club
  • Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI : Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Daum, T. (2017). Das Kapital sind wir. Zur Kritik der digitalen Ökonomie. Hamburg: Edition Nautilus.
  • Daum, T. (2018). Das Auto im digitalen Kapitalismus. Dieselskandal, Elektroantrieb, autonomes Fahren und die Zukunft der Mobilität, hrsg. von der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, Berlin.
  • Daum, T. (2019). Das Auto im digitalen Kapitalismus wenn Algorithmen und Daten den Verkehr bestimmen. München: oekom Verlag.
  • Daum, T. (2020). Agiler Kapitalismus. Hamburg: Edition Nautilus.
  • Denning, S. (2018). The Age of Agile: How Smart Companies Are Transforming the Way Work Gets Done. AMA-COM, American Management Association, New York, NY.
  • Denning, S. (2020a). “Why And How Volvo Embraces Agile At Scale“. Forbes. 26/172020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveden-ning/2020/01/26/how-volvo-embraces-agile-at-scale
  • Denning, S. (2020b). “Why Hardware Must Embrace Agile Principles", Forbes. 21.6.2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveden-ning/2020/06/21/why-hardware-must-embrace-agile-principles
  • Evannex (2022). “Learn About Tesla's Giga Press From IDRA.” 25/1/2022. https://insideevs.com/news/563005/tesla-giga-press-idra-documentary
  • Feynman, R., Leighton, R. (1997). Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman: Adventures of a Curious Character. New York: Norton.
  • Field, K. (2018). “Tesla Has Applied Agile Software Development To Automotive Manufacturing". 1/9/2018. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/09/01/tesla-has-applied-agile-software-development-to-automotive-manufacturing/
  • Financial Literacy (2020). “Elon Musk explains how Giga casting works for the Model Y", (YouTube). 24/9/2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQfKZ5lo9dc
  • Freeman, E.; Kommer, I. (2020). DevOps für dummies. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  • Freitag, M.; Rest, J. (2022). “Wie Elon Musk Apple übertrumpfen will“. Manager Magazin 2/2022.
  • Fuchslocher, G. (2022). “Wolfram Volk, TU München 'Gigacasting ist geeignet, den Karosseriebau neu zu denken”. 3/2/2022. https://www.automobil-produktion.de/interviews-734/gigacasting-ist-geeignet-den-karosseriebau-neu-zu-denken-501.html
  • Goreham, J. (2022). “Tesla's Low FSD Take Rate Offers Growth Opportunity”. 28/3/2022. https://www.torquenews.com/1083/teslas-low-fsd-take-rate-offers-growth-opportunity
  • Hejaaji, A. (2014): Agile Manufacturing: Development of a Tool to Assist in Implementation of Agility within Manufacturing Small and Medium Size Organisations. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • IDRA Group (2021). “Wichtige Ankündigung - Giga Press" (YouTube). 4/4/2021. https://teslamag.de/news/kompletter-tesla-rahmenguss-idra-giga-presse-mehr-kraft-47170
  • Ikonomov, P. (2020): Agile Manufacturing, Independently published.
  • Johanson, D. (2020). “Compilation: Best of Sandy Munro on Tesla”, (YouTube). 11/10/2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhVvFThHwIQ
  • Jürgens, U.; Krzywdzinski, M. (2016). New Worlds of Work. Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Justice, J. (2021). “Agile at Tesla with Joe Justice Agile Munich" (YouTube). 23/9/2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwtRJDRcXsY
  • Kämpf, T. (2018). “Digitale Transformation”, Das Argument, Nummer 328.
  • Klein, P.; Justice, J. (2021). Scrum Master: The Agile Training Seminar for Business Performance, Independently published.
  • Krachten, C. (2021). Tesla oder: Wie Elon Musk die Elektromobilität revolutioniert. Berlin: nuvarande.
  • Lambert, F. (2022). “Tesla has now more than 100,000 people in its Full Self-Driving Beta program – is an accelerated rate of improvement coming?“ 20/4/2022. https://electrek.co/2022/04/20/tesla-number-people-full-self-driving-beta-program-an-accelerated-rate-improvement-coming/
  • Laudon, K.; Laudon J.P. (2006). Management Information Systems. Managing the Digital Firm. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Lawley, B. (2016). “Tesla Agile Development: Product Management at its Best". 4.10.2016. https://280group.com/product-management-blog/tesla-agile-development
  • Layton, M. C.; Ostermiller, S. J. (2017). Agile Project Management for Dummies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lüthje, B. (2016). “Intelligent Manufacturing and Socio-Economic Rebalancing in China – Changing Production Networks, Work and Industrial Relations". Talk. 23/11/2016. https://www.wzb.eu/de/veranstaltungen/intelligent-manufacturing-and-socio-economic-rebalancing-in-china-changing-production-networks
  • Marx, K. (1863). Resultate des unmittelbaren Produktionsprozesses. Archiv sozialistischer Literatur 17, Neue Kritik, Frankfurt a.M. 1968.
  • Marx, K.; Engels, F. (1973). Das Kapital, Bd. I, Werke, Band 23. Berlin: Dietz.
  • Matousek, M. (2019). “MotorTrend named Tesla's 2013 Model S its ‘ultimate' car of the year among the vehicles that have won the honor in the past 7 decades“. https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-model-s-named-motortrend-ultimate-car-of-the-year-2019-7
  • McElroy, J. (2021). “Unlearning What Toyota Taught Us". 23/1/2021. https://www.wardsauto.com/industry-news/unlearning-what-toyota-taught-us
  • McFarland, M. (2022). “Tesla's layoffs hit Autopilot team as AI develops.“ 29/6/2022. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/29/cars/tesla-autopilot-data-label-layoffs/index.html.
  • McKenzie, H.; Seedorf, P. (2019). Insane mode - die Tesla-Story wie Elon Musk die Automobilbranche auf den Kopf gestellt hat und stellen wird. Kulmbach: Plassen Verlag.
  • Morgan, J. M.; Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota Product Development System. Integrating People, Process, and Technology. New York: Productivity Press.
  • Morozov, E. (2016). Digital democracy and technological sovereignty, Talk 13.12. 2016. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/digitaliberties/digital-democracy-and-technological-sovereignty
  • Morris-Suzuki, T. (1997). Capitalism in the Computer Age and Afterword, Davis. J., Hirschl, T. A., & Michael Stack, M. (eds.). Cutting Edge: Technology, Information Capitalism and Social Revolution, London, pp. 57–71.
  • Müller, A. (2021). “Die Bauunternehmer der Tesla-Fabrik: Kein Auftraggeber surft hierzulande auf so viel Geld wie Elon Musk". 13/9/2021. https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/joerg-uwe-und-jan-hendrik-goldbeck-die-bauunternehmer-der-tesla-fabrik-kein-auftraggeber-surft-hierzulande-auf-so-viel-geld-wie-elon-musk/27598708.html
  • Munro & Associates (2022). “Rear Cradle and Electric Drive Module | Tesla Model S Plaid Teardown”. 4/2/2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAKwoZqaPbk
  • Niedermeyer, E. (2019). Ludicrous : the unvarnished story of Tesla Motors. Dallas: Gildan Media.
  • OʻKane, S. (2021). “Tesla rolls out Safety Score-based insurance product in Texas“. 15/10/2021. https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/15/22728411/tesla-insurance-texas-safety-score-premiums-california
  • Pearl, M. (2018). Code with the wisdom of the crowd: Get better together with mob programming. Raleigh, <> Pragmatic Programmers.
  • Powell, Jamie (2020). “Morgan Stanley go all in on Tesla“, Financial Times, 18/11/2020. https://www.ft.com/content/42509bb8-a816-4d24-8b40-292402b23c00
  • Protectstar Inc. (2013). “iPhone 1 - Steve Jobs MacWorld keynote in 2007 - Full Presentation". YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQKMoT-6XSg
  • Randall, T.; Pogkay, D. (2022). “Tesla Now Runs the Most Productive Auto Factory in America“. 24/1/2022. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-tesla-factory-california-texas-car-production/
  • Reuters (2022). “Giga-casting and robots: How Volkswagen's Trinity aims to catch up with Tesla". 31/5/2022. https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/gigacasting-and-robots-how-volkswagens-trinity-aims-to-catch-up-with-tesla-2795249
  • Riering, B. (2022). Hilgenberg sieht Erfolg “auf lange Sicht", Handelsblatt,23/5/2022, https://www.automobilwoche.de/bc-online/cariad-kampft-mit-entwicklung-und-firmenkultur
  • Ruffo, G. H. (2022). “Tesla Model Y Will Gain Single Rear Casting Thanks To IDRA Group". 5/7/2022. https://insideevs.com/news/427179/tesla-model-y-casting-machine-idra-group/
  • Sattelberger, T.; Welpe, I., Boes, A. (2015): Das demokratische Unternehmen Neue Arbeits- und Führungskulturen im Zeitalter digitaler Wirtschaft. München: Haufe Lexware.
  • Schadt, P. (2021). Die Digitalisierung der deutschen Autoindustrie. Kooperation und Konkurrenz in einer Schlüsselbranche. Köln: Papyrossa.
  • Schiller, D. (1999). Digital Capitalism. Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Schmidt, B. (2022): “Tesla said to be developing app store to rival Apple and Android“. 7/2/2022, https://thedriven.io/2022/02/07/tesla-said-to-be-developing-app-store-to-rival-apple-and-android/
  • Seemann, M. (2020). Die Macht der Plattformen Politik in Zeiten der Internet-Giganten. Berlin: Christoph Links Verlag.
  • Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Stellman, A. (2014). Learning Agile: Understanding Scrum, XP, Lean, and Kanban. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.
  • Sutherland, J. (2014). Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time. New York: Crown Business.
  • The Agile Wire (2021). “Agile at Tesla with Joe Justice". 11/1/2021. Podcast. https://theagile-wire.libsyn.com/agile-at-tesla-with-joe-justice
  • TMIO Tesla (2021). “Tesla Giga Press will CRUSH”. YouTube. 4/5/2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZoVEauHDt4
  • Unusually Well Informed Podcast (2021). “Joe Justice | The Secrets to Agility at Tesla | Elon's Master Plan to Infinity”. YouTube. 21/11/2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKqKCn4fheY
  • Usborne, S. (2017). “How did Tesla make some of its cars travel further during Hurricane Irma?“ The Guardian. 11/9/2017.
  • Valentin, M. (2019). Le modèle Tesla. Du Toyotisme au Teslisme: La Disruption d'Elon Musk, Paris: Malakoff.
  • Valentin, M. (2021). Die Tesla-Methode: 7 Prinzipien, die Ihr Unternehmen fit für die Zukunft machen. Kulmbach: Plassen Verlag.
  • Valladão, A. G. A. (2014). “Masters of the Algorithms. The Geopolitics of the New Digital Economy from Ford to Google”. Wider Atlantic Policy Papers. May 2014.
  • Welch, D. (2018). “An expert dismantled a Tesla Model 3. He found poor design and manufacturing are squandering profits”. LA Times. 17/10/2018. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-model-3-design-profits-20181017-story.html
  • Wise, J. (2022). “How many Employees Does Tesla Have in 2022?” 24/7/2022. https://earthweb.com/how-many-employees-does-tesla-have
  • Youssef, M. (2017): Agile Manufacturing. Noor Publishing
  • Zhang, M. Y.; Dodgson, M.; & Gann, D. M. (2022). Demystifying China's innovation machine: Chaotic order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ziegler, A. (2020). Der Aufstieg des Internet der Dinge : Wie sich Industrieunternehmen zu Tech-Unternehmen entwickeln. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.

9. Copyright:

  • This material is "Timo Daum"'s paper: Based on "Agile Methods on the Shop Floor: Towards a “Tesla Production System”?".
  • Paper Source: DOI 10.34669/WI.WS/31

This material was summarized based on the above paper, and unauthorized use for commercial purposes is prohibited.
Copyright © 2025 CASTMAN. All rights reserved.

PDF View
Tags: CAD; ,Review